On 2014-06-20 14:02, Nicolas Spalinger wrote: > I think it's well-worth for the benefit of Debian and Ubuntu users of > this font (and the wider community) to continue to advocate for a > re-relase by upstream under a community-recognized and DFSG-approved > license instead.
Instead of what? Do you suggest that Nafees Web Naskh is dropped from the Debian archive and that both Nafees Web Naskh and Nafees Nastaleeq are dropped from the Ubuntu archive and that we leave Urdu speaking users of Debian or Ubuntu on their own with respect to fonts? Even if the license isn't *ideal* from a DFSG POV, it does not make the fonts non-free AFAICT. Hence a reasonable approach IMO would be to do both, i.e. keep accepting the current license for now while proposing upstream to re-release the fonts under a license without the mentioned ambiguities. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
