On Thu, 2014 Jun 12 8:03+0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> Well, I followed intrigeri remark: since guest session is not working
> anyway, there's no point in having a broken AppArmor profile for that.
> That's not the case for the lightdm_chromium-browser one, is it?
Uh, yes, it is. First of all, lightdm_chromium-browser is an
abstraction, not a standalone profile. It's where the actual parse error
was occurring:
apparmor[12873]: Starting AppArmor profiles:AppArmor parser error for
/etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session in
/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser
at line 20: syntax error, unexpected TOK_CONDID, expecting TOK_ID or
TOK_COLON
And now that the lightdm-guest-session profile has been removed, nothing
is using this abstraction. So, given that the abstraction is not usable
anyway due to the parse error, *why is the package still installing it?*
> In any case, please provide a working patch against the current
> package. I won't do anything more on this until someone actually test
> the changes.
# rm -f /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser
# /etc/init.d/apparmor reload
[...]
. ok
Seems to work for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
