On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > > 2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost <t...@coldtobi.de>: > > > > > > I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here: > > > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-it/aspell-it_2.4-20070901-0-2.1.dsc > > > (Of course the binary on mentors is currently built against > > > dictionaries-common-dev 1.23.2, so it will need a rebuild anyway as soon > > > as 1.23.3 is in the archives.) > > I've just uploaded a new version of the example package to mentors > (location's the same). > Changes are the suggested ones above: B-D only on unversioned aspell, > s/Vcs-git/Vcs-Git, removing aspell dependency in binary package.
Hi, and sorry for the delay. Noticed that it is tagged as not needing a sponsor. Do you want to have it there just as reference? > I think I've already collected this information. (However, this might be > inaccurate in details as the context was a little different when I > assembled this information. The focus was at that time if it has the > hashfile symlinked. ) > Then likely those packages would benefit from dh_aspell-simple: ... > aspell-en I have been using it in my tests. Can provide a patch if needed. > aspell-tl This one is mine. It also creates myspell-tl, so it will not have the big benefit other packages can get from aspell-simple. I do not think it worths the effort. On the other hand, I already sent the info to Dict-common-dev list, http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/dict-common-dev/2014-June/000789.html I got no reply, but only few maintainers are subscribed. Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
