Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 751432
Hi,
I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.26.x transition.
Currently there is Poppler 0.26.1 in experimental already.
This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
- libpoppler44 → libpoppler46
- libpoppler-glib8 -- BC with 0.24 (with few new symbols)
- libpoppler-qt4-4 -- BC with 0.24 (with one new symbol)
- libpoppler-qt5-1 -- BC with 0.24 (with one new symbol)
Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their
situation, sorted by solutions:
Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed:
calligra
cups-filters
gambas3
gdal
inkscape
libreoffice
pdf2djvu
pdftoipe
popplerkit.framework
texlive-bin
texworks (has a spurious dependency on libpoppler, handling it
upstream and then to Debian)
xpdf
Sources that currently FTBFS:
* gdcm
Compatibility with Poppler 0.26.x fixed upstream, asked to backport
the patches in #751432.
Other cases:
* derivations
This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.
I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the
following usertag:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=p...@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.26
A ben tracker for poppler would have:
title = "poppler 0.26";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ "libpoppler-private-dev" | .source ~ /texworks/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libpoppler46";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpoppler44";
Thanks,
--
Pino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
