On Thu 12 Jun 2014 03:53:35 PM PDT, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > I understand your concerns here, and I totally get what you’re driving > at, but in the packaging world wouldn’t this make sense to call it > "python-bash8"? Now the binary, I can agree (for reasons outlined) > should probably not be named ‘bash8’, but the name of the “command” > could be separate from the packaging / project name.
As a user, I hate to have to follow the abstruse reasoning of a random set of developers forcing a packager to pick a name for the package that is different than the executable. A unicorn dies every time `apt-get install sillypackage && sillypackage` results in "File not found". Dang! that was my favorite unicorn. -- Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
