12 червня 2014 о 18:14 +0200 Julien Cristau написав(-ла): > > What library changed its SONAME? > > > I suspect the issue is: That's right.
> > libppl-swi/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~) > libppl-swi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~) > libppl-swi/armel unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~) > libppl-swi/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~) > libppl-swi/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< > 6.6.3.0~) > libppl-swi/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< > 6.6.3.0~) > libppl-swi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~) > libppl-swi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~) > libppl-swi/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~) > libppl-swi/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~) > > And: > Files in second .deb but not in first > ------------------------------------- > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/libswipl.so.6.6.6 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/lib/libswipl.so -> libswipl.so.6.6.6 > > Files in first .deb but not in second > ------------------------------------- > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/libswipl.so.6.6.5 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/lib/libswipl.so -> libswipl.so.6.6.5 > > Євгеній, libswipl should really be its own split out binary package. > And change package names when its SONAME changes. I was thinking about it but, that library changes soname with every new upstream release. Additionaly I'll have to make the library package to depend on exact version of swi-prolog-nox package, because the library uses prolog parts. This will mean that different library packages will not be coinstallable. So I don't see that there will be any advantages from changing the package name for swi-prolog, unlike for normal libraries. The only difference is requiring new processing for every upstream release. And still asking for bin-NMUs after that. Regards, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
