On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:50:17AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hi, > > Here's another take on the build dependency loop issue involving > libraw1394 and (through a long dependency list) docbook-utils. > > What do you think of the attached very simple patch that only moves > docbook-utils and docbook-xml from Build-Depends to Build-Depends-Indep > instead?
And of course, it would all have been so much easier if I had actually attached the patch... G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
From ee6a71a9857421c93a620ec43adf164934009ce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Pentchev <r...@ringlet.net> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:37:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Move the docbook packages to Build-Depends-Indep. Since the programs from docbook-utils are only needed when building the arch:all libraw1394-doc package, this dependency (and the related dependency on docbook-xml) may safely be moved to Build-Depends-Indep. Among other benefits, this breaks a circular build dependency and makes it possible to bootstrap the build of libraw1394 without having built jadetex, libcupsfilters1, librsvg2-bin, libproxy1 and kdelibs5-dev first. --- debian/control | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index f54f3ca..11d4ba1 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ Source: libraw1394 Priority: optional Maintainer: Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev, docbook-utils, docbook-xml, dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev, dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) +Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-utils, docbook-xml Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Section: libs Homepage: https://ieee1394.wiki.kernel.org/ -- 2.0.0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
