On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:02:04PM +0800, Sphinx Jiang wrote: > I refreshed this patch with 2.19-1. > > Tested on mips64el device, build successfully. > > > Sphinx
I have just merged the non-controversial parts, that is everything but multlib. I am still opposed to having the o32 libraries in /lib and I am waiting for arguments about why it can't be for example in /libo32. Anyway I do wonder if we want multilib support at all on a new port, we now have multiarch to address this, so one can just install the libc6:mips on a mipsn32 or mips64 system, or libc6:mipsel on a mipsn32el or mips64el system to get o32 support. Also: > diff -Nru eglibc-2.19/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk > eglibc-2.19/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk > --- eglibc-2.19/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk 2014-06-04 19:50:40.000000000 > +0000 > +++ eglibc-2.19/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk 2014-06-09 05:27:56.000000000 > +0000 > @@ -240,6 +240,9 @@ > if [ "$$s" != "$$t" ] ; then \ > cp $$s $$t ; \ > fi ; \ > + if [ "$$suffix" = "-mips32" ] ; then \ > + sed -e '/ld.so.conf.d /d' -i $$t; \ > + fi ; \ > sed -e "s#TMPDIR#debian/tmp-$$curpass#g" -i $$t; \ > sed -e "s#RTLDDIR#$$rtlddir#g" -i $$t; \ > sed -e "s#SLIBDIR#$$slibdir#g" -i $$t; \ This already shows the kind of problem we might have. As /lib is already in the path, it is searched by default so you don't need any specific ld.so.conf entry. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
