On 06/08/2014 11:44 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > IMHO the open issue against policy doesn't make this bug report > against stunnel4 a serious one. Mraw, KiBi.
I disagree. Section 9.3 of the Policy Manual is quite obviously outdated. It says practically nothing about LSB, failing to mention even the LSB headers that are basically mandatory these days for update-rc.d to properly order dependencies. This is also a chicken/egg problem. The more holdouts there are to implementing LSB support, the longer it will take to get LSB features added to the Policy Manual. The two canonical sources of information should be considered the LSBInitScripts wiki page, and /etc/init.d/skeleton, both of which clearly indicate that 'status' is required. Moreover, the fact that stunnel is effectively broken for use with heartbeat/corosync also warrants a 'serious' status, IMHO. -C-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
