On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:33:29 +0100 Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no need for using newer -utils at the moment. The current > loop-aes-source in sid works fine with the version of -utils in sarge. > If some newer version of -source will require newer utils, I'll change > the dependencies of binary module packages to reflect such > requirements. By the way, you can use the upstream testsuite included > in the sid versions of loop-aes-$KVERS packages to verify that the > modules and -utils are working correctly. Just load the loop module > and run /usr/share/loop-aes-$KVERS/runtests. Got it - thanks for the information. > > So wouldn't it be a candidate for debian-volatile then? > > Perhaps, but something tells me this would be better be placed on > backports.org. I think I can directly upload to backports, so I'll > look into this once the backports repository gets ready for sarge. > Would that work for you like volatile, or is there something I'm > not considering about differences between them? For me volatile is just a more official backports ;-) So it's the same where you upload the package, it just should work well on Sarge. > cheers, > Max Greets, Evgeni -- ^^^ | Evgeni -SargentD- Golov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) d(O_o)b | PGP-Key-ID: 0xAC15B50C >-|-< | WWW: www.die-welt.net ICQ: 54116744 / \ | IRC: #sod @ irc.german-freakz.net
pgp0XP3YROibc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
