On Thu, 2014 Jun 5 22:16+0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Probably... but there's a bit more than Ubuntu in the AppArmor world. > So perhaps another distro is shipping 2.8.95 without the pile of non- > mainstream kernel patches. Do you want to ask on the AppArmor mailing- > list if this is the case? They're really nice and friendly :)
I suspect you know your way around there better than I do ;) It's possible SuSE is doing something like that---in which case, we may be able to ride their coattails. But of course, if any integration work needs to be done, it's going to be complicated by the fact that they're not a Debian derivative. > > For my part, I think option 1 is the way to go for Jessie. Debian as > > a whole is "well-tested, known working," after all :-) > > I'm still unsure personally, but it feels really good to get some > input. Thanks a lot! Glad to help. Regardless of what happens with the kernel/user code, the profiles still need all the attention they can get. Not least the Chromium profile (bug #742829). > (OT: you seem interested to improve AppArmor support in Debian, so I > encourage you to read https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/Contribute if > not done yet, and I warmly welcome you to join me^Wus on the > pkg-aa-profiles-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing-list :) Thanks, I might just do that! (I have some technical issues on my end with mailing lists that need to be addressed first...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
