On Fri, 06 Jun 2014, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > The better question however would be, if a package like this would be > able to pass NEW[1] (as wpa had to for 1.0-1 - and it will have to pass > through binary-NEW in the not too distant future again). While wpa
I believe so. Packages get rejected when their copyright file don't mention all the licenses that are mentionned in the source code. Missing attributions are certainly not a ground for reject. It might be that some ftpmasters are more zealous than others, and in that case a simple followup to the reject often helps to solve the problem. There's also an open bug against debian-policy to clarify this IIRC. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
