On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > tags 747609 + confirmed pending > forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html > thanks
Thanks! > On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the > >> process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. > >> As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. > > Created. > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Christian > >> > >> > >> Ben file: > >> > >> title = "ruby2.0"; > >> is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; > > > > you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as > > they often won't depend on ruby directly. > > How would we know whether they are good or bad if they don't depend or build > depend on ruby? They get dependencies on librubyX.Y generated dynamically based on the ones used at build time. They build-depend on gem2deb, which in turn will depend on the right rubyX.Y/librubyX.Y -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
