On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Jacek Sobczak wrote: >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> > Actually I apparently had -style-sifr lying around before I did the tests. >> > >> > After cleaning that up apt-get install libreoffice libreoffice-help-en-us >> > always >> > installs galaxy. So it should work? >> > >> > Did you specify any other theme explicitly or did you install something >> > else >> > and remove galaxy after it? That also would explain it. (And there's no >> > APT bug at all.) >> >> from LO 4.1.6 to 4.2.4. As you can see from the aptitude log below I >> did it in two steps on the same day. In the log all the LO packages > > Why two steps? And how did you upgrade? > > apt-get dist-upgrade should have done the right thing... > (Yes, I tested that.) > >> libreoffice-style-tango was removed from my system when I upgraded > [...] >> [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-style-sifr:amd64 >> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-style-galaxy:amd64 > > OK, clear. > > -sifr installed and -galaxy removed so you ended up with only -sifr - > which exhibits this because it seems to be incomplete...[1] > >> [HOLD] libreoffice-calc:amd64 >> [HOLD] libreoffice-impress:amd64 >> [HOLD] libreoffice-writer:amd64 > > Why? Did you do apt-get upgrade (which would explain this given they need > new packages installed) and _only_ then dist-upgrade? This is weird steps. > (I've seen documentation suggesting that, I still think this is > questionable..) > >> Will install 11 packages, and remove 7 packages. >> 8859 kB of disk space will be freed >> =============================================================================== >> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libcdr-0.0-0:amd64 >> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libmspub-0.0-0:amd64 >> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libvisio-0.0-0:amd64 > [...] >> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-draw:amd64 >> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-impress:amd64 >> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-math:amd64 > > And what did you do here? Or did you in some way enforce this manually?
I did it in two steps because it happened that not all packages were on the mirror yet when I was upgrading. So in the first instance I upgraded only those which were available and which I could install without breaking dependencies. In twenty minutes the rest appeared so I upgraded them. I use aptitude and normally for upgrades the command 'U' which must be more or less dist-upgrade equivalent. Of course for the first run I selected the packages to upgrade manually although without any enforcements. -- Cheers Jacek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
