Luis Alejandro Martínez Faneyth writes ("Bug#748266: wheezy-pu: package python2.7/2.7.3-6+deb7u2"): > On 18/05/14 16:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > This is not quite correct. I could not reproduce the problem > > upgrading a fresh 7.4 system to 7.5, nor have I seen it in the > > wild. > > > > Perhaps i should have been more clear on how to reproduce the bug, > sorry. On the test case you are presenting, the bug will only happen > if you do an aptitude safe-upgrade on a i386 machine. > > > The file lists for 2.7.3-6 and 2.7.3-6+deb7u2 are identical: > > > > $ debdiff python2.7_2.7.3-6_amd64.deb > > python2.7_2.7.3-6+deb7u2_amd64.deb File lists identical (after any > > substitutions) > > Not for the i386 build, as bug #702005 says. > > $ debdiff python2.7_2.7.3-6_i386.deb python2.7_2.7.3-6+deb7u2_i386.deb > [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have > different names, permissions or owners.]
Do you know why these files are in the i386 but not the amd64 .deb ? > > Only the intermediate package 2.7.3-6+deb7u1, which originated in > > stable-security, contains two files that do not belong to it: ... > > According to the changelog [1] the problem was detected and fixed > > in March, so users upgrading from 2.7.3-6 straight to > > 2.7.3-6+deb7u2 will not see a problem. 2.7.3-6+deb7u1 was never > > released in a DSA or through stable, so I don't believe that any > > real users will have it installed. Luis's comments about i386 seem to suggest that i386 users will see the bug, in which case providing a fix in stable-updates would be the correct approach. Have I misunderstood ? Thanks, Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org