Hello! On Sat 19 Nov 2005 21:18 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > First of all, this is not of severity important. Please stop this > severity inflation.
Well, from the definition of severity important: "a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone". This seemed to me exactly the case I experienced: *if* the bug was in caff, it rendered caff unusable to me (or to anyone at my university) without affecting other people. > On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Luca Capello wrote: > >> 2) For each key I've in my signature [1], only the mail to my >> University address (zoo.unige.ch) wasn't readable. > > So I bet your university mail server breaks things. I doubt there > is anything caff can do about this. It seems that you completely ignored the rest of my report. 1) I didn't say caff *is* the problem, I said that while I experienced the problem with caff, with other MUAs I can send/receive PGP encrypted mails via the university mail server. So, why I can't do the same with caff? Are the mails sent by Gnus/Mozilla different in term of content-type of whatever else from the one sent by caff? 2) I asked for help in debugging the problem: as you, I bet my university mail server breaks things, but how can I be 100% sure? What should I do to locate the problem? Just FYI, I was already considering to revoke my university address From my PGP key (all my mails are redirected to this address), but I'd like to understand the problem. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpAM6fGnLwOr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
