On 2014-05-11 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote:
> 2014-05-10 14:52 GMT+02:00 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de>:
[...]
>> That used to be the case but is fixed now. GnuTLS 3 depends directly
>> and indirectly via nettle on GMP. GPM was LGPLv3+ but is dual-licensed
>> GPLv2+/LGPLv3+ since version 6.0.0. GnuTLS 3 continues to be available
>> under LGPLv2.1+
> Sounds OK.
> Please upload a usable GnuTLS 3 package to backports after it hits
> testing to let me provide backports for Wireshark depending on it.

Hello Bálint,

the GnuTLS 3 package in bpo is fully /functional/ however there is
currently no GMP backport, i.e. if GnuTLS 3 in bpo currently only
works for LGPLv3+ compatible code.

I am also not sure that it is a great idea to upload gmp to bpo, I am
afraid of subtile issues like <https://bugs.debian.org/743087>. OTOH
not having a GMP backport will cause license breakage. Oh well.

cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to