severity 317953 grave thanks So apparently this bug is important enough to keep people from being able to use the program, and to make them grumble about it on IRC and in blogs, but not to make them touch the BTS and raise the severity... <sigh>
amd64 is a release candidate architecture for etch; even though it is not yet included in the main archive for logistical reasons, broken packages on amd64 should be treated the same as broken packages on any other release archs. *Build failures* are of lower severity when they're specific to amd64, because for our purposes there are no packages that have been officially built for amd64 and therefore no build failure is a regression (yet), but other RC bugs should certainly be treated as RC. Yes, this failure is due to a bug in python2.3, but seriously -- this isn't Java, and zip files aren't cool. I really can't see any good reason for obfuscating the python files in this manner within the Debian package. (I can think of some good reasons for doing so when distributing a bundle *outside* of Debian, but they don't apply here.) Please, stop shipping quodlibet in a zip file, so that amd64 users are also able to use this package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
