On mar., 2014-05-06 at 17:57 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > On Tue, 2014 May 6 23:39+0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > Line 20 is: > > > > # Allow ptracing processes in the chromium child profile > > ptrace peer=/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session//chromium, > > Oh, okay, so it's different in sid. In jessie, it's "capability > sys_admin," which otherwise appears to be supported syntax. > > > So I guess commenting the ptrace part should be fine? > > I think so, if for no other reason that the profile is unused :) It > does seem that Chromium needs ptrace permission for its own form of IPC--- > the profile in jessie appears to cover this with "capability > sys_ptrace," which I'm guessing is coarser-grained than "ptrace > peer=...". So the worse that should happen is that Chromium doesn't > work, in a non-existent LightDM guest session on Debian... > I'm ok for that, but if someone could actually provide a working/tested profile it'd help. I'd rather not upload that stuff twice or thrice just to pass one error at a time…
Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
