Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:34:06 +0200, a écrit : > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit : > >> Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including > >> embedded drm header. Cleaner? > > > > copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just including a header. > > > >> Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore? > > > > If the inclusion just works, then it's good. > > > > That being said, I checked in the changelog why the drm_fourcc.h header > > exists at all. It is there just for distributions which do not have it > > yet, it's not meant as a replacement for the non-DRI case. > > > > At any rate, such changes should very probably be discussed with > > upstream directly. > > I'll update upstream bug which could be ignored as it's been so far.
Make sure to also raise the question on the X development mailing lists. > In the meantime, how about applying it It's up to X maintainers to decide. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
