Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:26:44AM +0800, Keng-Yu Lin wrote: > As an Array 30 IM user, the ibus-table-array30 package did not > implement the full features of the Array 30 IME (such as no quick > codes, no first and second class simple codes) where ibus-array > implemented these extra features. > > Also as the package maintainer of ibus-array package, I am happy and > will spend some time looking at the ibus-python issue.
Great. Please check what did ibus-pinyin package did between 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 upstream versions to get the feel of migrating to Gobject Introspection based bindings. These seems to be useful git repo for ibus-pinyin https://github.com/ibus/ibus-pinyin.git https://github.com/phuang/ibus-pinyin.git Maybe this commit ... https://github.com/phuang/ibus-pinyin/commit/4950900e3acc6cf0741962179e2b2b924964ae4f which has changes such as; # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software # Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. -import sys -import gtk -import ibus + +import gettext import locale import os -import version -import gettext +import sys + +from gi.repository import GLib +from gi.repository import Gtk +from gi.repository import IBus from xdg import BaseDirectory +import version If upstream is stalled, you may think about taking over upstream. Osamu Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
