On 03.05.2014 13:55, Eugen Dedu wrote:
On 03/05/14 18:02, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
tags 739439 + patch
tags 739439 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for opal (versioned as 3.12.8~dfsg-1.1) and intend
to upload it to experimental soon. I'm not uploading because I thinking
about how to workaround #728452.

Please share any concerns that you have about that patch with me.

Thank you very much Reinhard for the patch and for testing, and sorry
for not having had the time to do it.

I looked at the patch and it seems fine to me.

But why do you work on opal 3.12.8?  It is not maintained anymore, and
current version is 3.14.  I plan to package 3.14 in the next months and
replace 3.12.8, which thus will never hit unstable/testing.  So better
to patch 3.10.10 version.

Because that is the version in unstable and I'm not sure if we really want to do both a libav and a libpt/libopal transition at the same time.

I did check with the latest upstream version, and the code did not seem to have changed much upstream; I'd therefore expect the patch to apply just fine.

Please let me know if you have any further questions about it.


Reinhard


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to