Hi Prach, On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:32:49PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> >> php-depend > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php-depend.git > > When I run pdepend, it fails with: […] > Can you reproduce the issue? Do you have an idea (to debug) about what's > wrong? (I have php5-imagick 3.1.2-1 installed). I’ve not yet tried to debug the issue, but want to state that it might just be a bad use case on my side: I’ve had good results while using it from a build process of another package I came across. To be clear, if it works for you (as needed for PHPUnit packaging), I’m willing to upload the package as is (and to eventually fill a proper bug report with hopefully more useful data of the issue I encountered) > >> > - phpmd > >> > http://phpmd.org > >> > >> php-pmd (assuming it's the same as PHP_PMD via PEAR) > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php-pmd.git > > It needs to build-depend on php-depend (for the manpage). That’s the only blocker IMHO (my other remarks were merely cosmetics), and I’m happy to upload it once you’ve confirmed php-depend is in the state you want it to be. Regards David P.-S.: FTPmasters just processed a bunch of needed dependencies, only phpdox (and php-parser as its last build-dependency) is to be processed. P.-P.-S.: the other cosmetic remarks, as reminder (no action needed if you disagree or don’t believe they worth being addressed). > > I've added you as uploader in php-depend and php-pmd, please take a > > look at those packages when you've time. > > That shouldn’t be needed (I’m just trying to help bootstrap the latest > PHPUnit 4, but have no intent to maintain it in the long run... yet ;). > > I also have second thoughts on package names: I finally opted for phploc, > phpcpd and phpdox for the three others, to match the command line tool. > > For those two, I believe sticking to php-pmd and php-depend still makes > sense (since they provide respectively the PHP/PMD and PHP/Depend > classes), but you may wish to also change them to phpmd and pdepend. > > If you decide not to change the package name (and even if the domain name > of the homepage may help "apt-cache search $cli" to find the right > package), you may consider adding something like "This package provides > the $cli(1) command line interface" to the package description. > > If you decide to change the package name, please add a "Provides: > $oldproposedname" to help the package manager find the correct > recommendations for phing until it’s rebuild. Please keep me posted ASAP > too in order to fix the pear-channels override soon (I plan to upload a > new version today).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
