On 1 May 2014 00:59, Chris Fordham <ch...@fordham-nagy.id.au> wrote: > Personally, I'd prefer that we use packer instead of bootstrap-vz ( > https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz) to build official Debian images > of which should be published on http://cdimage.debian.org or the more > appropriate file server for users to download. > > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Miguel Landaeta <nomad...@debian.org>wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> > >> > Did you have a look into >> > /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate >> > your own image via debootstrap. >> >> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them) >> >> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you >> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly >> maintained and signed images? >> >> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we >> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my >> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is >> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker. >> >> >> >> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/ >> >> -- >> Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org >> secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at >> >> http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9 >> "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche >> > > Could you elaborate on *why* you prefer packer? What are the advantages over bootstrap-vz? As I see it right now, I'd like to ask the question whether you could send packer via email or whether it would fit on a floppy (if you catch my drift<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SricpmKQd3U> ).
Anders
