Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 14:34 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > [assuming all involved are subscribed: posting only to bugreport] > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-04-30 12:53:22) > > Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 12:35 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > >> On 30 April 2014 02:10, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > >>> Status of packaging is that these libraries needs packaging first: > >>> > >>> node-source-map > >>> node-uglify-to-browserify > >> > >> About node-uglify-to-browserify: > >> You do not really need to package it, since it's only related to > >> uglify2.x (it has no reverse-dependency) > >> I think you can bundle it as a patch along with uglify v2.x. > > I am no fan of hiding upstream projects by maintaining as bundles in > Debian. > > If in fact it makes best sense for node-uglify-to-browserify to be part > of UglifyJS2 project, it makes more sense for me to have upstream merge > those projects. > > Or did I perhaps misunderstand your suggestion?
You understand correctly. I'm less strict about bundling... i'm using that workaround rarely, though. Anyway it doesn't matter here since in fact, uglify-to-browserify is "A transform to make UglifyJS work in browserify". I propose we postpone packaging of this module and list it in Suggests for now. > >> About node-source-map: > >> It build-depends on dryice (>=0.4.8). You can find a pre-release > >> package in pkg-javascript/node-dryice.git repository. > >> Once it done/uploaded to unstable, we will be able to build > >> source-map. > > > > I can help about that, > > Great! > > > > but could you find out about the dependency loop: > > dryice depends on uglify-js > > I suspect that such dependency would be only needed only for browser > use, not for use in a Nodejs environment (which includes build > environment for UglifyJS2). If that's true, I suggest to simply add > hinting as documented here: https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec I don't understand how that helps. In fact we have a simple uglify -> sourcemap+dryice -> uglify dependency loop. We could patch a little dryice so that it doesn't Depends uglify-js but only Recommends or Suggests it. Do i remember well ? would that be enough ? Related to the point above, it's interesting to note that dryice is a good example of what we could ask upstream to merge back into source-map. Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
