OK. I'll withdraw my objection to krb5-config moving to krb5-multidev. Shouldh we use alternatives for managing krb5-config from Heimdal vs MIT?
For what it's worth, I don't support asking package maintainers to update build-depends. The reason I thought introducing krb5-multidev made sense was for the few packages that need both installed at the same time. I think people who want to do so can file wishlist bugs saying that using -multidev packages and krb5-config.mit|heimdal has certain advantages. However it has complexity disadvantages (admittedly significantly fewer once we move krb5-config) and I think it should be viewed as maintainers MAY use krb5-multidev|heimdal-multidev rather than maintainers SHOULD. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
