On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:40 PM, David Moreno Montero <dmor...@coralbits.com> wrote: > If you agree, you may branch the onion source at github, and pull request me > the changes. OK, will do.
> About jquery, is it ok to include it non-minified? Also could be used > straight from the jquery CDN, but somehow I feel users would feel more secure > if its using only local resources. Better if not. 1) Not all users will have internet access for CDN. 2) jQuery may have performance / security issues anytime. Just depend on the needed version, as it's already packaged and taken care of. > About library versioning, I just added it, but I got a bug report that its > not following proper libtool standards. I'm still fixing that, but the > current solution should be on the debian branch. OK, waiting for that. > About manpages, I can try to prepare them ASAP, but some tips are welcome > about how to create great manpages: which programs/commands? is groff the > recomended way? For a start you may use 'apt-get install help2man; man help2man'. One more problem btw. LICENSE.txt states: "Contents of the src folder (the Library) is licensed under both GPLv2+ and Apache 2." while README.rst states: "The library is under the LGPL license, [...]" (which one?), then see a file, for example src/onion/block.c which has only Apache 2.0 license header. Which one is correct? Then you link together everything with src/onion/sd-daemon.[ch] which is licensed under MIT. I'm not a license expert and don't know what the result will be. Does linking MIT with (L)GPL code allowed? Where's / how MIT license vanished from the resulting library? Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
