On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:17:44PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > reopen 276871 309224 258934 327464 261979 290916 304027 314449 > thanks > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:03:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > #276871: Date shown in gdm is correctly localized, but only for a minute., > > which was filed against the gdm package. > [...] > > * New upstream release (closes: #313200, #309224, #258934, #327464, > > #261979, > > #290916, #276871, #304027, #314449) > > I'm happy to see that my bug, and many others, have been considered as a > request > for new upstream, which #313200 is, by the way. > > When will people just stop doing that ?!?
The debian/changelog file documents the changes _I_ made. And the change I made was "new upstream release". The list of bugs that fixes is listed. If you want to see details of changes upstream made, the upstream changelog contains these details. If you have reason to believe that upstream has not fixed these bugs, that is what the reopen command is for. Please stop using the command for other reasons. > > * Pass -dpi 96 to the X Server by default (closes: #285029) > That sucks badly. You just broke configuration of people who actually have a > correct configuration of their X Server. I changed the default configuration to be what Gnome (the default, and what many people expect to work best using the "Gnome Display Manager"), is going to use as the value of DPI _anyways_, and what most users expect to happen. (see the comments in the bug for more details) If you're a power user that wants to specify your own dpi value to X, go ahead. That's why options to X are specified in a configuration file.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature