On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:25:43 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes ("Re: Bug#741573: Two menu systems"):
> > if it takes 5 minutes to write a menu file and 5 minutes to switch to one
> > of those 'old style' window managers and test that it shows up as it
> > should, it is 3000 minutes. Or 1 hour per week in a year.
>
> I don't think you need to test it, if you don't want to. For
> something like a menu file it is perfectly fine to simply take the
> patch, as-is, when it's provided.I do understand your POV in that "a menu file it's simple enough" [simple] but I also read a lot of people complaining about us maintainers not testing our packages [0] and now we are suggested to not test a patch, even if it's small or "simple". So, for the sake of coherence, I will not buy that argument. [simple] as long as you remember the format. I don't. [0] I do also recognize that sometimes it's practically impossible to test everything, and there is always the human factor to have mistakes. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
