Hi, > > How to recognize a PALO that is "newer" ? > It should be palo 1.92 or higher. > > ... PALOHDRVERSION ... > I could update it to 5.
I think it is appropriate. Readers of libisofs docs and of PALO could make a clear connection. > We shouldn't make xorriso more complicated than necessary. Yeah. It already has a sufficient set of dark and dusty corners where new bugs quickly find a home. Notify me when you have more tangible plans for compressed kernels in ISO. For now i settle with the assessment that it should be well possible to let libisofs determine the uncompressed sizes. > > There will be a new xorriso-1.3.7.tar.gz soon. > Cool. Two "semi-stable" snapshots in one day is rather lukewarm. :)) Have a nice day :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
