On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 09:34 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't think I knew about this policy "should" (probably because I've > managed to avoid maintaining contrib/non-free packages).
It is semi-recent in policy terms and I expect very few non-free/contrib packages comply with it at this stage. > Is there a recommended way to encode this in copyright-format-1.0? I think just a Comment field at the top should do it. > Should we clone this bug against policy, to codify this as part of the format? That sounds reasonable to me. > Correct. FYI I sent a mail to the Intel people asking them to remove the additional terms so that it can be in Redhat/Fedora & Debian main. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
