On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:01:53PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:32:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:30:50PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > This is the bug about requesting a new upstream version.  I'm pretty sure
> > that's not the bug your users were running into.

> The code worked fine on mawk from other distro's (and gawk) -  but not
> ubuntu/debian. So from their PoV the bug is caused by the rather old
> mawk version carried by us.

> Now, of course, one can argue that they shouldn't be surprised that
> debian comes with something outdated...

No, I argue that if they have a problem with the code they should report the
exact issue instead of blaming it on the package being "outdated".

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to