Hi Lisandro, On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 01:27:06PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > tag 730095 +patch > thanks
> Note: I'm not the cmake maintainer but I'm just trying to get this solved.
> Ruby guys: is there any chance to apply the following patch to
> /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindRuby.cmake and see if you apps compile/work ?
I tested your patch with qtruby and ruby/ruby2.0 from experimental, giving
ruby2.0 as default Ruby interpreter.
It seems that there is a typo in the patch, because I get this error:
CMake Error: Error in cmake code at
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindRuby.cmake:101:
Parse error. Expected "(", got newline with text "
".
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:5 (find_package):
find_package Error reading CMake code from
"/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindRuby.cmake".
I replaced endif by endif(), and could go a bit further but not far.
I got this error:
CMake Error at
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
Could NOT find Ruby (missing: RUBY_CONFIG_INCLUDE_DIR) (found version
"2.0.0")
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:315
(_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindRuby.cmake:242
(FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
CMakeLists.txt:5 (find_package)
I tried earlier the patch provided in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739826#17
(without yours). And it managed to build qtruby against ruby2.0.
It seems that it tries to solve a similar problem to this one.
Could you evaluate it?
About ruby1.9.1 and multiarch, I strongly believe that the plan is to
drop ruby1.9.1 as soon as possible, and that it will not be
multiarchified.
Cheers,
Cédric.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
