On 17.03.14 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:10:05 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > On 15.06.06 Francesco Poli (f...@firenze.linux.it) wrote:
Hello Hilmar. > > > In _Extended Color Support_ > > > --------------------------- > > > > > > whether there exists an image named foo.!50!white!25!black. > > > > > > s/foo.!50!white!25!black/foo.!25!black!25!white/ > > > > > This is the only bug I still found (pgfmanual page 927 bootom). > > Shouldn't the new string be "!25!white!25!back" (b/c it says: If you > > nest colormixin environments, the dirent mix-ins are all appended.)? > > Frankly speaking, after *all this time*, I do not remember anything > about the reasoning behind my proposed typo fix. > > I would have to (re-)read the relevant section(s) of the current manual > in order to tell whether you are right... > Could you be so kind to do so? AFAIC not more than half a page. I never used pgf, hence I can't really tell you if I'm right and just need anybody seconding me. Thanks, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
