Michael Fladischer <mich...@fladi.at> writes: > On 2014-03-17 05:35, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It seems a little weird that a shared library would force all programs >> that want to use it to have to build in a particular standardization >> mode. Are you sure that's the right path forward? It's particularly >> problematic if packages won't build with C++11, although maybe we're >> supposed to be moving the whole archive to that? > I didn't like this approach either, but it was the most straight forward > one that didn't require to patch libmemcached. But in the end, the best > way would be to patch it. I'm preparing a new version of libmemcached > which will enter experimental as soon as I have confirmed that all its > reverse dependencies can build with it. Ah, excellent, thanks. That will give Shibboleth upstream a chance to look at C++11 at their leisure. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
