On 3/16/14, 11:03 PM, "Russ Allbery" <r...@debian.org> wrote: > >Oh, are they linked to the libraries? Oh, sure enough. Okay, those have >to go into a separate package then. Are they needed by shibd? I know >they're needed by the Apache module, so it should depend on the plugin >package.
None of them are needed specifically, they're plugin modules to my runtime, same as Apache modules are to Apache's. Nothing in the core code depends on them, and I don't believe any default features use them. >I'm inclined to call it libshibsp-plugins, if that sounds like it makes >sense, parallel to the -dev package. That's what they are, so yes. >Hm, and maybe I should go with >libshibsp-runtime as well instead of shibboleth-sp2-runtime. Are the >configuration files and schemata only used by the library, or do other >things, like the Apache modules, FastCGI programs, and shibd, use them >directly? It's gray, but I guess ultimately it's the library using them, the rest of the pieces are just initializing the library to do work. I suppose I can't think of any specific way in which the other pieces rely directly on those files. >Thanks for all your advice on this! Thank you for all the effort on the project's behalf. -- Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
