Hi brian, "brian m. carlson" <[email protected]> writes: >> Could you please help us by sending a patch for module-init-tools that >> does what Michael Biebl outlined in #27? > > No, because I believe the right solution is to make systemd respect the > way the file works already, and not to break the semantics of the > current file in favor of another solution. Making systemd split on > whitespace isn't very hard, and the fact is there's no good reason to > change the existing behavior. > > In general, if there are things that switching to systemd breaks that > have worked for a long time (i.e. regressions), we need to fix systemd, > and not implement hacks that work around systemd's shortcomings. In this specific case, upstream has a good argument for not supporting options in /etc/modules, as has been explained in this thread.
It’s too bad you don’t want to actually help. I’ll try to work on a patch, but it’s not very high priority for me. -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
