> Il Sabato 8 Marzo 2014 23:19, Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> ha scritto: > > On March 6, 2014 07:29:31 AM Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >> Ok, can you then please sponsor a package for me? I can fix this bug, also >> #740628 and push on mentors. > > I can do that. Please send a follow-up to the bug when your work is ready. > I > (or another debian-med team member) will act on it. >
Here you are :) https://mentors.debian.net/package/insighttoolkit I kept changes as minimal as possible > >> > Is there some reason you can't use ITK v4? >> >> The main reason is: > > [...limited architectures...] > >> many packages that have been successfully built with the v3 won't build >> anymore against v4, so the rationale is "use 4 on amd64 and i386, > switch to >> v3 for other archs". > > OK. But you do understand that in future this will no longer be an option > because, at some point, v3 will be removed from the archive in favour of v4 > that is now in Testing. > Ack. >> I don't know if you have an hint for building them against v4 (removing > the >> package from ftpmaster will let the package reach testing I know) > > If you want to build a package that requires ITK, at present you have two > options: (a) build only for the two ITK-supported architectures, or (b) stay > with v3. There's a discussion going on now in debian-med regarding a third > option: restoring architectures to v4. That will be nice for the long term indeed, evenmore because v3 has some problems fixed in v4 I heard from nifti2dicom maintainer, in the meanwhile I think the fallback is the easiest way to let the packagenifti2dicom reach testing > > Regards, > > -Steve Best regards, Gianfranco > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
