Thomas Dickey dixit: >you may notice that the change was intentional (to fix a serious bug >in contrast to a user-configurable preference).
Hm, which bug? >So - to the point: is /bin/mksh in /etc/shells? If not, adding it >there is the way to get your intended behavior. If it is, then >there's some additional aspect that I've overlooked. Yes, /bin/mksh is in /etc/shells. I can test patches, if you throw them to <t.gla...@tarent.de> (work eMail). In case that’s relevant, I have UXTerm*VT100*loginShell: true in my .Xresources. (And my login shell is mksh. Of course. ☺) bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
