Hi,

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
> 
> > Upstream has fixed a memory leak in file. Upstream commit is at [1].
> 
> Thanks, will cherry-pick that just-in-case for unstable as the next
> upstream release will probably take a few weeks.

Thanks!

> > AFAICS this was introduced in [2] so in 5.14.
> 
> Do you see an implication for security? While I can think of some
> synthetic use cases where this might be exploited, I don't see a real
> problem. It shouldn't be possible to leak more than just a few hundred
> bytes each time.

Agree with you.

Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to