2014-03-04 8:34 GMT+01:00 Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org>:
> u-boot-tools should *not* have been removed from amd64, i386, mipsel, s390x or
> sparc; it is still useful there. hrm. Will this cause any issues for the next
> upload?

Whoops, something should have gone wrong :/
Feel free to upload a new revision, in the event it'll end up in NEW,
I'll take care of fast-tracking it.

> Also, uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage should still be removed from all
> architectures. It was a transitional package in wheezy that is no longer built
> in sid. Should I file a separate bug for that?

They should appear (or should have appeared) in the cruft report, so
it's normally not needed.

Cheers,
Luca


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to