On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:51:42PM CET, I got a letter > where Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said that... > > What you press ctrl-z to stop it, elinks catches the SIGTSTP signal, > > before it sends itself a SIGSTOP signal, it arranges a child process to > > send itself a SIGCONT after 1 second. > > Aha! Yes, the reason is that if you start multiple elinks instances, > only the first one actually does stuff, and the other instances merely > connect to it. So if you would suspend the first instance, all the other > ones would hang up. >
Well, that makes sense. So what is the real reason of this bug, elinks is somehow confused whether it is at foreground? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
