Package: python-django-guardian Version: 1.1.1-2 Severity: important Tags: patch upstream
Hello maintainer, As described in <https://github.com/lukaszb/django-guardian/issues/164>, setting AUTH_USER_MODEL to an abstract user model results in a broken get_objects_for_user method. A patch sourced from upstream is attached. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
From c2a97befa491e498bf27912a6cf1343ca40aa896 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: thepapermen <the.paper....@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:17:20 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed Django 1.6 incompatibility issue.
---
guardian/shortcuts.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guardian/shortcuts.py b/guardian/shortcuts.py
index 9ca2bdf..2219348 100644
--- a/guardian/shortcuts.py
+++ b/guardian/shortcuts.py
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ def get_objects_for_user(user, perms, klass=None, use_groups=True, any_perm=Fals
group_filters = {
'permission__content_type': ctype,
'permission__codename__in': codenames,
- 'group__%s' % get_user_model()._meta.module_name: user,
+ 'group__%s' % get_user_model().groups.field.related_query_name(): user,
}
groups_obj_perms_queryset = group_model.objects.filter(**group_filters)
if group_model.objects.is_generic():
--
1.8.5.1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
