On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:30:43PM +0400, Vitaliy Filippov wrote: > >>subversion build still depends on GCJ. I think OpenJDK should be > >>used instead, > >>because GCJ is a very outdated compiler. > > > >Does the use of GCJ cause any actual problems? Is the OpenJDK jre > >unable to load the GCJ-built modules? > > No, of course not! I think you'd already know if it would :) > > But why do you use GCJ given that OpenJDK is available?
Why do you request the use of OpenJDK given that GCJ is availale? :) > Are there > any special concerns that force svn to be built with GCJ? Peter provided his reasoning behind using GCJ in #710498. Seeing as using GCJ doesn't break anything and I don't have any compelling reasons to do otherwise, I've deferred to Peter's reasoning. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
