At 20:23 13.11.2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
severity 338911 important
tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14
> (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine
(Alphastation 500/500).
Did you build your own kernel? I wonder if this is alpha-specific.
Yes its my own kernel, but this is only a patched debian one (fixed
IRQ handler). So almost exactly the debian one.
> Nov 13 18:22:14 localhost udevd[8994]: init_uevent_netlink_sock: bind
> failed: No such file or directory
This is the code that fails:
snl.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
snl.nl_pid = getpid();
snl.nl_groups = 0xffffffff;
uevent_netlink_sock = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_DGRAM,
NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT);
retval = bind(uevent_netlink_sock, (struct sockaddr *)
&snl, sizeof(struct sockaddr_nl));
But I do not know exactly what ENOENT means when binding an AF_NETLINK
socket.
Cannot help here, you should send the bug upstream. Is there a change
in the code compared to 0.071?
> Additionally I have a lot of occurences of the following warning with
> udev-0.071-1:
>
> Nov 13 19:04:09 localhost udev[3832]: add_to_rules: invalid rule 'PROGRAM'
As it says, it looks like one or more of your rules are broken.
I will look after it, but I did not change any of the default rules...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
