On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:42:34AM +0900, Daigo Moriwaki wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@canonical.com > > wrote:
> > The google-perftools package works not only on the powerpc architecture, > > but > > also on the ppc64el architecture that is currently being bootstrapped in > > Ubuntu. Would you please add ppc64el to the architecture list for the > > package? > Although I am not familiar with Power PC series, 'ppc64el' seems to be > Ubuntu specific architecture. Is it same as 'ppc64' in Debian backports? > http://www.ports.debian.org/ It is a different architecture; the 'el' stands for 'little-endian'. While the architecture does not yet exist in Debian, there's nothing Ubuntu-specific about the ppc64el support, and I expect we will eventually see the ppc64el port in Debian at some point in the future. The google-perftools porting to ppc64el is also endian-agnostic, so the package would probably build and work on both ppc64 and ppc64el, if you wanted to enable the build for both architectures. I've only personally tested on ppc64el, so that's the only architecture I added to the list. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature