James McCoy <james...@debian.org> writes: > >> vim -R %s > > There was some discussion about the view alternative on debian-devel > last year and the mime-support maintainer had agreed that /usr/bin/see > shouldn't be part of that alternative set.
I agree see should not be view, but I'd meant this particular bug to be among the actual vi's -- ie. to be sure of getting vim and not say nvi. (I've thought further that there's probably no need for the generic "vi" rules presently in /usr/lib/mime/packages/vim-common. If each vi flavour has rules then all are covered. Or if the rule is present then it ought to check that a vi exists, and perhaps ought to be in mime-support package so as not to depend on vim-common in case you've removed it in favour of nvi etc.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
