On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:32:53AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:09:25PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution"):
> > > I'm not sure I like the way this is worded, I would have prefered
> > > that you asked me about this before calling for votes.
> >
> > So assuming that the current vote is cancelled due to 4 people ranking
> > FD first: would you care to say what the wording should be ? I don't
> > think any of us care very much about this wording and we all agree
> > about the intent, so it shouldn't be controversial.
>
> My biggest concern is that you can only do this if the result of
> the GR is FD.
So let me expand on that a little. Image the following options
- A: something that doesn't overrule the ctte (1:1)
- B: something that does overrule the ctte (2:1)
- FD
If option B would win but is dropped because of the 2:1 majority
and option A wins instead the project would have made a decision
and you can't overrule that anymore.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
