On 14-02-05 11:28 AM, Curtis Gedak wrote:
On 14-02-05 11:14 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
I believe that -1 was masking the real error, which is in the
partition resize code, since the new size of the partition is not an
even multiple of 4k. The end sector also is not aligned to a 1 MiB
boundary.
From thinking further on this, the question of MiB alignment likely
belongs in a different bug report, since this changes the behavior of
how GParted has been working in the past.
In this bug report, the partition has been shrunk and moved to the right
by the user changing the starting sector. The end sector is never
changed throughout the operation (by the user or GParted). I'm not
saying that this is right or wrong, but I think it should be dealt with
separately. The primary focus is to at least get back to the original
behaviour of GParted in which the operation successfully completes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
