Hi, I regularly use rename(1) and miss it on non-Debian systems. The fact perl provides it currently doesn't matter to me (or I'd argue any end user)
> On 2 Feb 2014, at 15:12, Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> wrote: > A > maintained version is available as a separate package, libfile-rename-perl. This is a frustrating package name for an end user binary. Reminds me of the difficulty I have remembering which package the LWP-tools "GET" and "HEAD" live in. What's wrong with "rename"? > 2) Make libfile-rename-perl be Standard, to match perl, without adding > any dependencies. I like this one, which also sidesteps the difficulty of the new package name. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
